Home | About | Contact

 

Post-electrospinning expansion of 2D membrane to 3D scaffold using gas foaming

Conventional electrospinning typically forms flat, 2D membrane with small inter-fiber pores. As the individual fiber is weak, post-electrospinning methods of fluffing up the membrane to form a 3D scaffold is challenging and run the risk of breaking the fibers in the process. Gas foaming provides a viable alternative to open up the pores between the fibers without excessive application of force. In this technique, the 2D electrospun membrane is soaked in a solution that bubbles when agitated. Since the membrane is totally immersed in the solution, bubbles are formed on the fiber surfaces that are located outside and within the membrane. Formation and coalescence of the bubbles will force the fibers apart which create a more open scaffold. Jiang et al (2015) demonstrated the feasibility of this process using electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber membrane and NaBH4 as the foaming agent. Higher concentration of foaming agent was found to significantly increase the thickness of the membrane over a shorter duration. McCarthy et al (2021) also used NaBH4 as a foaming agent for expansion of electrospun PCL nanofiber mats. Prior to submersion into NaBH4 solution, the nanofiber mat was first submerged in liquid nitrogen so that the mat is fully wetted to facilitate penetration of NaBH4 solution into the pores. The mat was left in NaBH4 solution for 24h for expansion. This is followed by washing in distilled water and vacuum lyophilization until frozen and dry. The resultant PCL matrices were subsequently gelatin-coated and crosslinked to ensure elasticity and matrix shape memory. The foaming agent was so effective that the nanofiber mat with an initial mean thickness of 0.105 cm was expanded to a thickness of 7.33 cm.


Morphology of nanofiber mats produced using the Fluidnatek LE-100 with 3D printed caps on a 20-emitter array before and after expansion and 0.5% gelatin-coating. A, SEM image of LE-100-fabricated nanofiber mat. B, SEM image of the cross section of 3D nanofiber matrices expanded from a LE-100-fabricated nanofiber mat followed by 0.5% gelatin coating. C, High magnification of (B). D, A side (i. and front) view of a LE-100-fabricated nanofiber mat. E, A side view of a 3D nanofiber matrice expanded from a LE-100-fabricated nanofiber mat followed by 0.5% gelatin coating. F, Thicknesses of the nanofiber mats before and after expansion. (****P <.0001) [McCarthy et al 2021]

This technique for expanding 2D membrane is very versatile as demonstrated by the expansion of the membrane forming a tubular scaffold. With a tubular scaffold as the starting structure, after 24 hours of foam forming expansion, its lumen was completely covered with fibers and the end form is a solid rod instead of a tube [Jiang et al 2015]. This is in contrast with the cuboid and random form constructed from flat 2D membrane.


Schematic illustration of bubbles pushing fibers apart to create larger pores.

The expanded membrane with increased pore size allows better infiltration of the scaffold by mammalian cells. Comparison of NIH3T3 fibroblasts cultured on 2D electrospun PCL membrane and the foam-expanded electrospun PCL membrane showed great contrast in the cell distribution. On 2D electrospun PCL membrane, cells are only found on the surface of the scaffold. On the expanded scaffold, cells are found throughout the thickness even for scaffold with less thickness increment [Jiang et al 2015].

In a modified version of using gas foaming to transform 2D electrospun membrane into 3D structure, Chen et al (2020) added F-127 into poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) solution before electrospinning into nanofibrous membranes. The surfactant F-127 enhances the hydrophilicity of the PCl nanofiber. This allows rapid water penetration into the fiber matrix. NaBH4 was used as the bubbling agent for rapid evolution of H2 gas in the presence of water. For the formation of 3D structure, F-127/PCL nanofiber membrane was placed in a mold and immersed in NaBH4 solution. It took less than a minute for the bubbling to expand the membrane to fill up the mold. To fix the 3D structure, the expanded sample was immersed in gelatin solution before freeze drying.


Fast transformation of 2D nanofiber mats into pre-molded 3D scaffolds with oriented porous structure. Schematic illustrating the procedure of converting a 2D nanofiber mat into a cylinder-shaped nanofiber scaffold (a) and hollow tube-shaped scaffold (b) by expanding the mat in customized molds. (c) Photographs of transformed, cylinder shaped, hollow tube-shaped, cuboid-shaped, and sphere-shaped nanofiber scaffolds. 3D nanofiber scaffolds with irregular shapes produced through confined expansion in irregular spaces. (d) Schematic illustrating the procedure of converting a 2D nanofiber mat into an irregular-shaped nanofiber scaffold by expanding the mat in a customized, irregular-shaped mold. (e) The photographs showing the transformed 3D scaffolds with chicken leg-like shape (i), fish-like shape (ii), bread-like shape, (iii) and castle-like shape (iv). (f) The photographs showing the top view (i), bottom view (ii), and side view (ii and iv) of a 3D scaffold with human liver-like shape. The fibers were stained with 1% (w/v) rhodamine 6 G in red [Chen et al 2020].

Chen et al (2020) et al has demonstrated that this is a fast and easy method to transform 2D electrospun membranes into 3D structures that conforms to the shape of the mold. However, there are several questions that need to be addressed. During bubbling, the gas may enter the nanofiber matrix and disrupt the nanofiber morphology. From the SEM images, it can be seen that the 3D structure is made of separate fibrous walls. However, it is not clear whether the nanofibers on the wall retain a distinct and separated fiber morphology or have mostly fused together. While it is obvious that in its dry form, the 3D structure was able to take the shape of the mold. It is likely that the structure will collapse when wetted and it may not recover to the original shape. This will need to be verified with subsequent reports.


The internal structure characterization of confined, expanded nanofiber scaffolds. (a) SEM images showing cross section and longitudinal section of cylinder-shaped, hollow tube-shaped, cuboid-shaped, and sphere-shaped scaffolds. Cylinder-shaped nanofiber scaffolds with tunable pore sizes and porosities. (b) SEM images showing the cross section and longitudinal section of cylinder-shaped nanofiber scaffolds expanded from fiber mats that are 1 mm, 0.75 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.25 mm thick. Insets: the corresponding magnified images. Pore sizes (c), relative volume change (volume of scaffold after expansion/volume of nanofiber mat), and (d) relative density fold change (density of scaffold after expansion/density of nanofiber mat) (e) of cylinder-shaped nanofiber scaffolds expanded from fiber mats with different thicknesses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01. [Chen et al 2020]

Published date: 27 October 2015
Last updated: 28 December 2021

Comments
[+]


Google Ad.